Summary: An Ohio judge ruled against the prosecution in a murder case due to their reliance on facial recognition technology from Clearview AI, raising concerns about the tool’s admissibility as evidence. The ruling emphasizes the limitations of such technology, which was not disclosed in the search warrant affidavit. As a result, critical evidence obtained in the search has been suppressed, complicating the prosecution’s case.
Affected: Judicial system, law enforcement agencies, Clearview AI
Keypoints :
- Ohio judge found law enforcement’s reliance on Clearview AI’s facial recognition violated due process and lacked probable cause.
- Clearview AI warns its technology should not be considered definitive evidence, highlighting the risks of using it as a primary tool for arrests.
- The case poses broader implications for prosecutors nationwide who may be relying on similar technology for evidence.