Summary: A critical vulnerability, CVE-2024-7012, has been identified in Foreman, allowing unauthorized users to gain administrative access to Red Hat Satellite due to an authentication bypass flaw. This vulnerability, with a CVSS score of 9.8, affects multiple active versions of Red Hat Satellite, posing a significant risk to enterprise environments.
Threat Actor: Unknown | unknown
Victim: Red Hat Satellite | Red Hat Satellite
Key Point :
- CVSS score of 9.8 indicates the highest severity of the vulnerability.
- The flaw arises from a misconfiguration in the Foreman-Puppet integration with Gunicorn versions prior to 22.0.
- All active versions of Red Hat Satellite (6.13, 6.14, and 6.15) are confirmed vulnerable.
- Mitigation strategies are limited, prompting organizations to consider alternative measures like network segmentation.
- Potential for widespread unauthorized access to critical infrastructure in enterprise settings.
A critical vulnerability, CVE-2024-7012, has been discovered in Foreman, a widely used open-source lifecycle management tool. This authentication bypass flaw, with a CVSS score of 9.8 (the highest severity rating), could enable unauthorized users to gain administrative access to Red Hat Satellite, a commercial offering built on Foreman.
Foreman, a widely-used lifecycle management tool for provisioning, configuring, and monitoring physical and virtual servers, integrates with configuration management software such as Ansible, Puppet, and Chef. The vulnerability stems from a misconfiguration in the Foreman-Puppet integration when deployed with Gunicorn versions prior to 22.0. This misconfiguration, combined with Apache’s mod_proxy failing to properly unset HTTP headers due to underscore restrictions, opens the door to authentication bypass attacks.
The impact of CVE-2024-7012 is severe. Red Hat has confirmed that all active versions of its Satellite product (versions 6.13, 6.14, and 6.15) are vulnerable to this exploit. Red Hat Satellite, which is built on Foreman, is a popular platform used by enterprises for system lifecycle management, making the scope of the vulnerability significant. These systems are used in a wide variety of enterprise settings for managing server environments, meaning that the potential damage from this flaw could be widespread, leading to unauthorized access to critical infrastructure.
While the issue has been acknowledged by Red Hat, mitigation strategies are currently limited. Existing options do not meet Red Hat’s criteria for ease of use, broad applicability, or stability, leaving many organizations in a precarious position.
Until a comprehensive patch is available, organizations are urged to follow any forthcoming security advisories and consider alternative mitigation measures, such as network segmentation or restrictive firewall rules, to limit exposure.