This article discusses strategies to counter China’s use of state-sponsored proxies in hybrid warfare. It analyzes the threats posed by these proxies, such as cyber groups and political influence networks, and outlines a comprehensive approach utilizing frameworks like DIMEFIL and SWOT. A coordinated response involving diplomatic, military, economic, and cyber measures is emphasized to effectively deter and disrupt China’s hybrid tactics. Affected: cyberspace, geopolitics, international alliances
Keypoints :
- China is leveraging state-sponsored proxies for hybrid warfare, involving cyber attacks, political influence, and economic coercion.
- Key proxy groups include cyber actors like Volt Typhoon and APT41, political entities like the United Front Work Department, and maritime militias.
- The 4S Model outlines the importance of recognizing proxy actors, assessing vulnerabilities, and coordinating responses.
- DIMEFIL framework assists in developing multi-domain strategies against proxies, emphasizing diplomacy, information, military, economic, financial, intelligence, and legal actions.
- Strengthening alliances such as AUKUS, QUAD, and NATO is pivotal in countering China’s proxy influence.
- AI and technology enhancement are crucial in disrupting Chinese cyber operations.
- Utilizing SWOT analysis helps identify and exploit China’s weaknesses while reinforcing U.S. and allies’ strengths.
MITRE Techniques :
- T1086 (PowerShell): Utilize PowerShell to execute malicious commands on compromised systems.
- T1213 (Data from Info on Network): Collect information about a network’s configuration to inform future attacks.
- T1070 (Indicator Removal on Host): Techniques used to delete or obscure logs and indicators of compromise on the host.
- T1078 (Valid Accounts): Use valid accounts to access systems without raising alarms.
Indicator of Compromise :
- No IoC Found
Views: 15